|
|
California's Power Crisis
| ||||||||
Big Government Hurts US Again ... |
|
| Current Situation |
Government often assigns misleading labels, and a prime example is California's so called "deregulation" of their electrical power system. A honest description would be "re-regulation" - that's short for revised regulation. California certainly did not privatize their power grid over to the free market, and the Associated Press tells what happened: http://wire.ap.org/APpackages/california_power/ Modern businesses involved in exchange of commodities trading nearly always hedge risk by procurement via long term contracts. Baseline needs are filled this way, and only peak demands are satisfied by the spot market. The amount of power not tied up in long term contracts is the market's "float", and that is generally a small percentage of the overall supply. The legislatures were either very dumb, or else they deliberately set up non-profit companies with the intent of throwing them to the wolves. A decision made when the spot market prices were low turned out to be a very bad idea when the spot market prices jumped due to market forces such as supply/demand and the weather. The government-mandated lack of adequate float in the power supply market would make the price then skyrocket. Geeezzzz .... talking about DUUHHHHH !!!!
Some folks would blame corporations for corrupting California's legislative
process. Even if corporations did lobby legislators to establish this monstrosity,
it was still
the legislators who took the action. Consider this: suppose a criminal
offered to give me a million bucks if I were to shoot myself in the head.
<Drum roll ...> Ok .... I did it, I shot myself in the head. Whose fault was it?
... The
bad man who offered the money, or myself - the fool who pulled the trigger.
California legislators were the fools who pulled the trigger ... Californian officials have accused
companies of price gouging. Obviously, many companies would take
advantage of botched government regulations. As a potential accuser,
however, don't automatically take the Californian government's word ...
After all, they are guilty of implementing a botched re-regulatory scheme. Their opinion is biased. |
| Proposed Changes |
California needs to fix
their own mess. |
| Expected Benefits |
No burden on the federal government. |
|
|